REGULATION TIME BOMB, CAN YOU SAY CRA
People who know me well are aware that I expound at length
sometimes about the destructive effects of over regulation on the economy. The
pervasive intrusion of the world’s manufacturers into the U. S. market place
multiplies the damage done to American businesses by our tax and regulatory
burden. The products of our businesses must be competitive in the free market or
the businesses will fail! To illustrate my point consider the 5.4 Billion hours
each year that Americans spend complying with the tax code. The cost of this
time, even at the minimum wage, is $39.15 Billion dollars a year not counting
the cost of the taxes themselves. The federal bureaucracy pumped out 80,000
pages of new regulations in 2013 alone. Laws are passed by the legislative
branch of government and submitted to the President for signing into law. Once
signed the laws are turned over to one of the departments of the federal
government’s leviathan bureaucracy to write the enacting regulations. The cost
of complying with and proving compliance with these regulations is a cost that
our international competitors don’t have. Allow me to illustrate my point using
one law from the 1970s.
In 1977 President Carter signed into law an innocuous piece
of legislation called the “Community Reinvestment Act” (CRA). The purpose of
the legislation was to encourage banks to lend in their local communities and
thereby stimulate local economies. Administrations change and with them the
emphasis that is placed on enforcement of existing laws. Regulators started
holding banks accountable for CRA compliant lending quotas in the mid 1990s
under the Clinton administration. The move put pressure on lenders in low
income areas to increase loans with relaxed lending standards so that they
could meet the quotas. Interest rates were high enough at that time to
discourage a wave of refinance even with the lower standards. Regulators again
on Clinton’s watch threatened to make mortgage companies, who weren’t governed
by the law, comply with the CRA. The threat got mortgage companies to behave as
if they were regulated by the law extending its effect. Regulators pushed by the
G.W. Bush administration next favored low to no down payments loans when
evaluating a banks compliance with the CRA. During the Bush administration banks
were informed that all lending standards that exceeded CRA standards risked
being seen as evidence of unfair lending. In regulator speak that is big time
arm twisting to make banks lower all of their lending standards. Bankers
couldn’t object to the arm twisting publicly without appearing to resist an
important piece of civil rights legislation. Automated underwriting of loans
was thrown about, in the most pejorative way, during congressional hearings as
evidence of bad practice or even predatory lending. John Carney in his
excellent article in Business Insider, 6-27-09, put it this way. “Those not
employing automated underwriting would be putting their CRA rating at risk.
Automated underwriting was seen as a way of eliminating bias in lending.” Banks
felt safe making the loans as home prices kept rising improving collateralization
at the same time Fannie and Freddie offered to buy $2 trillion worth of
“affordable mortgages” from primary lenders. CRA loans did not have higher
default rates than other loans increasing the banks sense of security. Banks
that did not meet CRA volume guidelines could still qualify by buying Mortgage
Backed Securities (MBS) based on CRAs. The pernicious evolution of regulations
aimed at social engineering in the home ownership market across multiple
administrations combined to build a bubble that burst in the autumn of 2008.
Over and over again with the predictability of the sun setting,
politicians and bureaucrats place artificial constraints on a free market and
end up causing the market to collapse. A trillion dollar TARP bail out for
banks and a worldwide recession costing countless jobs and business failures
came about courtesy of unelected bureaucratic regulators who never suffered
repercussions. Today banking regulators are once again encouraging sub-prime
home mortgages while the FED is pumping Billions of dollars a day into the
economy building the next securities bubble on Wall Street. Meanwhile Congress
fails to pass a single constitutionally mandated budget for five straight years
and continues deficit spending at record levels. The new healthcare law is in
the process of crippling 1/6 of the economy while, for some strange reason throwing
13 million illegal aliens into the legal workforce with a path to citizenship
is the priority for Congress. The President with executive orders and EPA
regulations is in the process of doing to the coal industry what
over-regulation did to Americas steel mills.
Coming full circle I struggle to understand the madness of
our own government taxing and regulating manufacturers until they can’t compete
in the marketplace with foreign goods, all the while pontificating about jobs
being their number one priority. I have personally run a manufacturing business
for thirty one years and lived with endlessly increasing regulation and its
compliance paperwork. It is time to vote for Congressmen with business
experience so that they understand the necessity of reducing government interference
in our free market.
No comments:
Post a Comment